litebrokers.blogg.se

Oregon trail 2 seriours consequences
Oregon trail 2 seriours consequences





oregon trail 2 seriours consequences

The second consequence of setting this trail up was the expansion of the US civilised land. Half died and other half ate the dead to stay alive. Their wagon derailed and with no carpenter they could not fix it. Reed who set out for California via the Oregon Trail in May 1846 (1 month after recommended date) and were trapped along the way in the Sierra Nevada Mountains in what was one of the coldest winters on record. Famously, the Donner Party was led by George Donner and James F. As a result, people did die along the way. Starting at Independence, Missouri and ending in Fort Hall, Idaho (what was previously Oregon territory) this 3,200km long trek was dangerous and long.

oregon trail 2 seriours consequences

The first consequence of setting up the Oregon Trail was the amount of people dying along the way.

oregon trail 2 seriours consequences

First published by explorer Jedidiah Smith in 1825, it was the only practical way for migrants to make this journey. This was because if you wanted to get to the west coast via boat you would have to go around the entire of South America as the Panama Canal had not been setup and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago was completely covered in ice.

#OREGON TRAIL 2 SERIOURS CONSEQUENCES TRIAL#

The Oregon Trail was the trial used by migrants and Americans to get from the east coast to the west coast and was the cheapest option (still expensive) at the time. Arguably this was the beginning of sectioning off the Indians into manageable zones (reservations) as the US aimed for strategic land positions as well as good farmable areas.Įxplain two consequences of setting up the Oregon Trail (1836). This lead to disputes as chiefs that were following buffalo often ran into homesteaders and tried to get the new homesteaders off their land even though they didn’t even own it anymore. The second consequence of the treaty was the US’ ability to confirm the protection of its citizens as they travelled through and to the mid-west (regions that had been sectioned off for the US), to “civilise” the land. This resulted in the Indians signing a treaty that they didn’t understand (as the warriors didn’t know English) and one that didn’t have representation of the populace. Multiple people ran a tribe and the US government found it difficult to get an individual from each tribe to represent all of them – in many cases they ended up getting warriors and not chiefs with no skill in negotiation or leadership. The first consequence of the Fort Laramie Treaty is the Indians not knowing what they had signed up to do. The US government needed to guarantee the safety of white settlers travelling through the Indian land as this would result in migration further West of the Appalachian Mountains and enable the US to stabilise their future of being a global powerhouse without the threat of a nation rising nearby to tackle America. The Fort Laramie Treaty was created by the US government to help the situation that was ever increasing between white settlers moving onto the Plains and the Plains Indians. RAW Paste Data Explain two consequences of the Fort Laramie Treaty (1851).







Oregon trail 2 seriours consequences